The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HUGO K. SCHULZ and LEONARD O. TURNER
__________
Appeal No. 2001-0017
Application No. 09/040,479
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-8, 10-12, and 14-25. Claims 9 and 13 are
indicated by the Examiner as being allowable subject to being
rewritten in independent form to include all the limitations of
the base claim and any intervening claims. An amendment filed
February 23, 2000 after final rejection was denied entry by the
Examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007