The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM D. KING and FREDERICK D. OBERHAUS
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0150
Application No. 09/250,617
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 3 through 5, which are all the claims pending
in the application as claims 1 and 2 have been canceled.
The appellants claimed subject matter is a suspended shoe
rack. An understanding of the claimed subject matter can be
derived from a reading of exemplary claim 4 which appears in the
appendix to the appellants’ brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007