The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JIBIN YANG and SIAVASH ESHGHY
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0151
Application No. 08/850,981
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McQUADE, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 6, 8
to 9, 19 and 20. Claims 28 to 30, 32 and 33 are allowed. Claims 10 to 12, 21, and 22
are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claims, but would be
allowable if rewritten in independent form including all the limitations of the base claims
and any intervening claims. Claims 7, 13 to 18, 23 to 27, 31 and 34 have been
cancelled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007