Ex Parte CHLOUPEK et al - Page 11

          Appeal No. 2001-0294                                                         
          Application No. 09/004,399                                                   

          motor by using clock pulses.”  Accordingly, we do not sustain the            
          35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of independent claims 1, 7 and 15, nor             
          of claims 2-6, 8-14 and 16-21 dependent thereon.                             
                                      CONCLUSION                                       
               In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner                  
          rejecting claims 1-21 under 35 U.S.C. § 112 and under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103 is reversed.                                                           
                                       REVERSED                                        



                         JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP          )     APPEALS                  
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )       AND                    
                                                        )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                         MAHSHID D. SAADAT              )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              

          MDS/ki                                                                       



                                          11                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007