Ex Parte FEYGIN et al - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for               
                             publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                                                                              Paper No. 14                     

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                                 __________                                                    
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 __________                                                    
                      Ex parte ILYA FEYGIN, RHETT L. AFFLECK, LESLIE A. WALLING,                               
                    PETER KIESELBACH, GREGORY LOUIS KIRK, and IAN HENDERSON                                    
                                                 __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 2001-0352                                               
                                            Application 08/872,097                                             
                                                 __________                                                    
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                ___________                                                    


             Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, TIMM, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                           
             MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               
                                      ORDER VACATING REJECTIONS                                                
                                      AND REMANDING APPLICATION                                                
                   This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 1-9, 17-29,             
             35-40, and 47-65.  Claims 10, 30, 44, 45, and 46 have been cancelled, while claims 11-            
             16, 31-34, 41-43, and 66-67 have been allowed.                                                    
                                               THE INVENTION                                                   
                   The invention relates to a method and apparatus for exchanging fluid in chemical            
             synthesis procedures.  In one claimed embodiment, a plurality of reaction chambers are            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007