Ex Parte YAMAMOTO - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2001-0713                                                        
          Application 09/016,304                                                      

               an intermediate region between said driving part and said              
          generating part is set as a non-polarized insulating layer; and             
               the inner electrodes which oppose each other are partially             
          exposed to different side end faces of said piezoelectric ceramic           
          plate so that the polarities thereof may be opposite to each                
          other and are alternately connected to each other by outer                  
          electrodes and further connected to respective electronic                   
          terminals, said piezoelectric ceramic transformer being driven in           
          a radial direction expansion vibration basic mode.                          
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Clawson et al. (Clawson)      3,610,969          Oct. 05, 1971              
          Ogawa                         4,564,782          Jan. 14, 1986              
          Sugishita                     5,828,160          Oct. 27, 1998              
          (filed Sep. 10, 1997)                                                       
          The following rejections are on appeal before us:                           
          1. Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                      
          being anticipated by the disclosure of Ogawa.                               
          2. Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                   
          unpatentable over the teachings of Ogawa taken alone.                       
          3. Claims 2 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
          being unpatentable over the teachings of Ogawa in view of                   
          Clawson.                                                                    
          4. Claims 5 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
          being unpatentable over the teachings of Sugishita taken alone.             
          5. Claims 6 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
          being unpatentable over the teachings of Sugishita in view of               
          Clawson.                                                                    
                                         -3-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007