Ex Parte ELSHEIKH et al - Page 2



           Appeal No. 2001-1105                                                                    
           Application No. 09/312,267                                                              

                                           THE INVENTION                                           
                 The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward a process                    
           for making 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane.  Claim 4 is illustrative:                      
                 4.    A gas phase process for preparing readily recoverable                       
           1,1,1,3,3-phentafluoropropane which comprises (a) contacting                            
           1,1,1,-trifluoro-3-chloro-propene with hydrogen fluoride in the                         
           presence of a supported antimony halide catalyst under conditions                       
           sufficient to achieve at least about 95% conversion of said 1,1,1-                      
           trifluoro-3-chloro-2-propene; and (b) recovering 1,1,1,3,3-                             
           pentafluoropropane from the resulting reaction mixture.                                 
                                          THE REFERENCES                                           
           Boyce et al. (Boyce)            5,616,819          Apr.  1, 1997                        
           Tatsuo et al. (Tatsuo)1        WO 97/24307         Jul. 10, 1997                        
                 (PCT application)                                                                 
                                           THE REJECTION                                           
                 Claims 2 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                      
           unpatentable over Boyce in view of Tatsuo.                                              
                                              OPINION                                              
                 We reverse the aforementioned rejection.  We need to address                      
           only claim 4, which is the sole independent claim.                                      





                 1 Citations herein to Tatsuo are to the English translation                       
           thereof which is of record.                                                             
                                                2                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007