Appeal No. 2001-1148 Page 11
Application No. 09/114,552
specification, we conclude that the examiner has not met the burden of establishing
a prima facie case of obviousness of the claims over Kress, Kitamoto, Sista,
Tartaglia, Dubuc, Halaas, Cusin, and Capecchi.
The rejection of claims 11-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Kress, Kitamoto, Sista, Tartaglia, Dubuc, Halaas, Cusin, and
Capecchi is reversed.
REVERSED
WILLIAM F. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007