The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 45
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SEIICHI KONDO, YASUO WADA, TSUYOSHI UDA, TOKUO KURE,
TSUNEO ICHIGUCHI, SHINJI OKAZAKI and YOSHIMASA MURAYAMA
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1193
Application No. 08/463,761
____________
HEARD: July 11, 2002
____________
Before KRASS, BARRETT and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-3, 13-24, and 27-51.
Claims 5-12 have been non-elected and claims 4, 25 and 26 have been
canceled.
The disclosed invention is directed to a superfine electronic
device constructed with atomic fine lines. The following claim is
illustrative of the invention.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007