The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HERMANN BEISEL and RUDI JUNGHANS
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1214
Application No. 09/213,726
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (Paper No. 10,
mailed April 13, 2000) of claims 17 to 19 and 22 to 28.1 Claims 1 to 16 have been
withdrawn from consideration. Claims 20 and 21 have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
1 Claim 17 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007