Ex Parte HASTINGS - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2001-1301                                                         
          Application 08/867,949                                                       

          periphery of the film behind the opaque border.  The strips                  
          cooperate to selectively attach the film to the board with a                 
          document affixed therebetween.                                               
               The film component of the Easyboard product constitutes a               
          display frame meeting all of the limitations in the appealed                 
          claims except for the one in independent claim 39 requiring the              
          attachment means to be capable of selectively engaging the fabric            
          of a fabric covered surface and the one in dependent claim 43                
          further defining the attachment means as comprising hook-type                
          fasteners.  As indicated above, the attachment means on the                  
          Easyboard film are loop-type fasteners.  The record is devoid of             
          any evidence that these loop-type fasteners are capable of                   
          selectively engaging a fabric, or that the hook-type fasteners               
          which they do selectively engage comprise a fabric as urged by               
          the examiner (see pages 5 and 6 in the answer).                              
               The appellant’s arguments that the Easyboard product is                 
          further deficient with respect to the subject matter claimed                 
          because (1) it is not used in combination with a fabric covered              
          wall, (2) it is a two-piece holder which does not meet the                   
          “unitary” limitations in claims 39 and 40 or the “flexible”                  
          limitation in claim 40, and (3) its attachment means has four                
          sections rather than “three” as recited in claim 43 are                      

                                           4                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007