The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARY M. FOLEY and BEAUFORT M. LANCASTER
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1390
Application No. 08/922,599
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and
6. Claims 2 through 5 stand objected to by the examiner, but
would be allowable if amended as indicated (Paper No. 19; page
4). These claims constitute all of the claims in the
application.
1 The hearing set for Thursday, September 13, 2001 was
waived by appellants (Paper No. 27).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007