Ex Parte DORSCHUG et al - Page 5


             Appeal No. 2001-1586                                                     Page 5                      
             Application No. 08/402,394                                                                              

             since the method claims on appeal require the use of this compound.  Also, nucleic acid                 
             sequence claim 34, vector claim 35, host cell claim 36 and fusion protein claim 37,                     
             would also be patentable if the compound of claim 33 is determined to be novel and                      
             unobvious.                                                                                              
                    The examiner has relied upon Markussen ‘212 and Markussen EPO in the                             
             alternative in stating the rejection of claim 33.  The two Markussen patent documents                   
             appear to be equivalent, or at the least, the examiner has not pointed to any significant               
             difference in their disclosures.  As such, we shall limit our consideration of the issues               
             raised in this appeal to Markussen ‘212.  In similar fashion, the examiner has not                      
             distinguished in any meaningful sense between Grau ‘684 and Grau ‘332.  Thus, we                        
             shall limit our consideration of patentability of claim 33 in light of Grau ‘332.                       
                    As we understand the examiner’s position in regard to the patentability of the                   
             compound of claim 33 it is as follows.  Markussen ‘212 describes a genus of                             
             mini-proinsulin precursors at column 2, line 63-column 3, line 18 as follows:                           
                           According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a                  
                    DNA-sequence encoding insulin precursors of the formula                                          
                           B(1-29)-(Xn-y)A(1-21)                                     I                           
                    wherein Xn is a peptide chain with n amino acid residues, Y is Lys or Arg, n is an               
                    integer from 0 to 33, m is 0 or 1, B(1-29) is a shortened B-chain of human insulin               
                    from PheB1 to LysB29 and A(1-21) is the A chain of human insulin, with the proviso               
                    that the peptide chain –Xn-Y- does not contain two adjacent basic amino acid                     
                    residues (i.e., Lys and Arg).                                                                    
                           Preferred insulin precursors of the above formula I are B(1-29)-A(1-21),                  
                    i.e. m=0 in formula I, and compounds with a relative short bridging chain between                
                    the B(1-29)- and the A(1-21)-chain.                                                              
                           When m=1, then n is preferably 1-33, more preferably 1-15, 1-8 or 1-5 and                 
                    most preferably 1-3 or 1-2.  X may preferably be selected from the group                         
                    consisting of Ala, Ser and Thr, the individual X’s being equal or different.                     
                    Examples of such preferred compounds are B(1-29)-Ser-Lys-A(1-21) and B(1-                        
                    29)-Ala-Ala-Lys-A(1-21).                                                                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007