Ex Parte SCHMOOCK - Page 1




                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                         
                                 publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                     

                                                                                      Paper No. 26                         

                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                      __________                                                           
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                      __________                                                           
                                           Ex parte HELMUTH SCHMOOCK                                                       
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                 Appeal No. 2001-1818                                                      
                                                 Application 09/048,533                                                    
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                HEARD:  MAY 23, 2002                                                       
                                                      __________                                                           
              Before LIEBERMAN, DELMENDO, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                          


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         

                     This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-15,                   
              and 32.  Claims 16-18, 20-31 and 33 have been withdrawn from consideration, and                              
              claims 4 and 19 have been canceled.                                                                          
                                                        CLAIMS                                                             
                     Claim 1 is representative of the claims on appeal, and reads as follows:                              
                     1.  A foil having two substantially parallel surfaces, comprising: a substrate                        
              having a first side at one of said surfaces and a second side; a metallic film vaporized                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007