Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte KRIENKE et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2002 > Ex Parte KRIENKE et al - Page 1

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 17              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                  Ex parte KENNETH A. KRIENKE, KAY Y. BLOHOWIAK,                      
                        LARRY K. OLLI, and JOSEPH H. OSBORNE                          
                            ___________                                               
                                Appeal No. 2001-1820                                  
                             Application No. 09/169,280                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                      _________                                       
          Before WARREN, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 17, 24 and 25.1  Claims 9-14,            
          22, 23, 26 and 27 stand withdrawn from further consideration by             
          the examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b)(Brief, page 2).                  
          Claims 18, 20, 21 and 28-31, the remaining claims pending in this           
          application, stand allowed by the examiner (Brief, page 2; final            

               1Appellants’ amendment after the final rejection was refused           
          entry by the examiner (see the amendment dated Apr. 24, 2000,               
          Paper No. 10, refused entry as per the Advisory Action dated May            
          3, 2000, Paper No. 11).                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007