onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

US Supreme Court
US Tax Court
Board of Patent Appeals

State Laws

Alabama
Arizona
California
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Massachusetts
Michigan
Nevada
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Texas
Virginia
Washington

US Code

1 USC - General Provisions
2 USC - The Congress
3 USC - The President
4 USC - Flag and Seal
5 USC - Gov't Organization
6 USC - Domestic Security
7 USC - Agriculture
8 USC - Aliens and Nationality
9 USC - Arbitration
10 USC - Armed Forces
11 USC - Bankruptcy
12 USC - Banks and Banking
13 USC - Census
14 USC - Coast Guard
15 USC - Commerce and Trade
16 USC - Conservation
17 USC - Copyrights
18 USC - Crimes
19 USC - Customs Duties
20 USC - Education
21 USC - Food and Drugs
22 USC - Foreign Relations
23 USC - Highways
24 USC - Hospitals
25 USC - Indians
26 USC - Internal Revenue Code
27 USC - Intoxicating Liquors
28 USC - Judiciary
29 USC - Labor
30 USC - Mineral Lands
31 USC - Money and Finance
32 USC - National Guard
33 USC - Navigation
34 USC - Navy (repealed)
35 USC - Patents
36 USC - Patriotic Societies
37 USC - Uniformed Services
38 USC - Veterans' Benefits
39 USC - Postal Service
40 USC - Public Property
41 USC - Public Contracts
42 USC - Public Health
43 USC - Public Lands
44 USC - Public Printing
45 USC - Railroads
46 USC - Shipping
47 USC - Telecom
48 USC - Territories
49 USC - Transportation
50 USC - War

US Constitution

Preamble
Art. I - Legislative
Art. II - Executive
Art. III - Judicial
Art. IV - States' Relations
Art. V - Mode of Amendment
Art. VI - Prior Debts
Art VII - Ratification

Ex Parte BATES et al - Page 13

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2002 > Ex Parte BATES et al - Page 13 




              Appeal No. 2001-2004                                                                Page 13                 
              Application No. 08/956,715                                                                                  


                     The rejection of claims 13 and 14 is not sustained.                                                  












                                                      SUMMARY                                                             
                     The rejection of claims 1-12 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-                   
              type double patenting is sustained.                                                                         
                     None of the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) are sustained.                                       
                     The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                                                    





















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 


Last modified: November  3, 2007


Business Contracts