Ex Parte BATES et al - Page 13




              Appeal No. 2001-2004                                                                Page 13                 
              Application No. 08/956,715                                                                                  


                     The rejection of claims 13 and 14 is not sustained.                                                  












                                                      SUMMARY                                                             
                     The rejection of claims 1-12 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-                   
              type double patenting is sustained.                                                                         
                     None of the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) are sustained.                                       
                     The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                                                    




















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007