Ex Parte GENTRY et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-2525                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/000,579                                                  

          composition.  An understanding of the invention can be derived              
          from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.             
                    1.  A process for recovering aromatic compounds from a            
               mixed hydrocarbon feedstock containing aromatic compounds              
               and non-aromatic compounds of from between 5 and 12 carbons,           
               comprising:                                                            
                    providing a first portion of the mixed hydrocarbon                
               feedstock having a given composition to a liquid-liquid                
               extractor;                                                             
                    providing a second portion of the mixed hydrocarbon               
               feedstock having the same composition as said first portion            
               to an extractive distillation column; and                              
                    recovering aromatic compounds from the first portion of           
               the mixed hydrocarbon feedstock and from the second portion            
               of the mixed hydrocarbon feedstock via parallel operation of           
               the liquid-liquid extractor and the extractive distillation            
               column.                                                                
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Vickers et al. (Vickers)           3,844,902      Oct. 29, 1974             
          Eisenlohr et al. (Eisenlohr)       3,862,254      Jan. 21, 1975             
               Claims 1-3, 5, 7-16 and 55 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Eisenlohr.  Claims 4, 6, 22             
          and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                     
          unpatentable over Eisenlohr in view of Vickers.                             
               We refer to appellants’ brief and to the examiner's answer             
          for an exposition of the respective viewpoints expressed by                 
          appellants and the examiner concerning the rejections.                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007