Ex Parte Cullen - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   
                                                                                      Paper No. 21            
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                         Ex parte STEVEN R. CULLEN                                            
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2002-0032                                             
                                           Application No. 08/514,507                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
            ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claim 10.              
            Claims 1-9, 15 and 16 have been allowed, and claims 12-14 have been canceled.                     


                   We REVERSE.                                                                                












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007