Ex Parte LATARNIK et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                                                                                                Paper No. 23              

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                         

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                 Ex parte MICHAEL LATARNIK and HELMUT FENNEL                                              
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                                  Appeal No. 2002-0245                                                    
                                                Application No. 09/202,412                                                
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                        
              Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
              NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                          



                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 16 to                     
              21, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                                


                     We REVERSE.                                                                                          










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007