The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEFFREY GARY DENBY and DANIEL ROBERT FUZZEN
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0251
Application No. 09/220,170
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection
of claims 7, 9 and 14 in Paper No. 10, mailed April 24, 2001.
Claims 8, 10 through 13 and 16 stand objected to, but have been
indicated by the examiner to be allowable if rewritten in
independent form. Claims 1, 3 through 6 and 15, the only other
claims remaining in the application, stand allowed. Claim 2 has
been canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007