Ex Parte ACKER - Page 5




             Appeal No. 2002-0311                                                          Page 5              
             Application No. 09/030,241                                                                        


                   However, Darrow takes an approach directly opposite to that set forth in                    
                   claim 1.  Rather than acquiring position of the invasive device or probe                    
                   only while the patient is in a particular respiratory state, Darrow continually             
                   acquires the position of the probe at every respiratory state.  Darrow also                 
                   monitors the position of a point on the subject using optical, ultrasonic or                
                   mechanical device (FIGS. 2, 3, 4).  However, Darrow uses this information                   
                   to distort a previously acquired image so that the distorted image always                   
                   represents the spacial relationships of objects within the body accurately,                 
                   at all stages of the respiratory cycle.  While this approach theoretically                  
                   would result in accurate superposition of the position of the probe on the                  
                   displayed image, it requires substantial mathematical manipulation of the                   
                   actual data constituting the image . . . .  Moreover, it is directly antithetical           
                   to the approach taken by Applicants [sic].                                                  
             From our perspective, this makes it clear that the difference between the Darrow                  
             method and that which is recited in the appellant’s claim 1 resides in Darrow’s continual         
             monitoring of the respiratory cycle as opposed to monitoring it only a single selected            
             respiratory state in each cycle, as in the claim.                                                 
                   Ben-Haim is directed to an apparatus and method for treating cardiac                        
             arrhythmias.  The appellant has explained the Ben-Haim system on page 8 of the Brief              
             (emphasis has been added):                                                                        
                   Ben-Haim uses a “trackable mapping/ablation catheter (e.g., 51, FIG. 10)”                   
                   and “reference catheters (e.g., 110, 112, and 111, FIG. 10)” (col. 3, lines                 
                   44-46).  The reference catheters are positioned within the heart as, for                    
                   example, in the manner illustrated in FIG. 10 so that the reference                         
                   catheters remain in fixed positions within the heart (col. 13, lines 58-66).                
                   The movement of mapping catheter 51 is tracked so that the image of the                     
                   catheter can be superposed on an image of the heart chamber.  “To                           
                   correct for displacement of the heart chamber that occurs during the                        
                   cardiac cycle, the catheter location is sampled at a single fiducial point                  
                   during the cardiac cycle. To correct for displacement of the heart chamber                  
                   that may occur because of breathing or patient movement, a set of more                      
                   than two locatable catheters [i.e., the reference catheters] is placed at                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007