The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SIEGMAR FISCHER, ERNST-WILHELM ALTENAU,
RALF AUMUND-KOPP and GUNTER SIKORSKI
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0342
Application No. 09/295,399
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 4, 6
and 7. Claims 2 and 8-14 have been withdrawn as being directed to a non-elected
invention, and claims 3, 5 and 15 have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007