Ex Parte SWINK et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                          Paper No. 12                
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte EDWARD A. SWINK,                                
                                 CLAYTON M. SMITH,                                    
                                   CARL L. MURPHY                                     
                                  and RICK LAVELOCK                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2002-0492                                  
                               Application 09/348,141                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Edward A. Swink et al. appeal from the final rejection of              
          claim 16.  Claims 1, 8 through 12, 14 and 15, the only other                
          claims pending in the application, stand allowed.                           
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants’ invention relates to “a folding ramp that              
          provides access between two surfaces of different heights, such             



                                          1                                           



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007