Ex Parte LE - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                 Paper No. 25         

                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                          
                                    ____________                                      
                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                             
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Ex parte TAM KIEN LE                                 
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2002-1685                                 
                              Application No. 08/995,431                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before McQUADE, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                  Decision on Appeal                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 14 to 17, 20 and 23.  Claims 18, 19, 21, 22,            
          24 and 25 are allowed.  Claims 1 to 13 have been canceled.                  
               The appellant’s invention relates to a spring door                     
          crustacean trap.  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth            
          in the appendix to the appellant’s brief.                                   







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007