Ex Parte YEO et al - Page 9




              Appeal No. 2002-1788                                                                Page 9                
              Application No. 09/217,667                                                                                


                     function F(c). But, from relation (5), e3(Xs3)-e2(Xs2)=Xs3+c. Therefore, for the point             
                     Xs2 =X*s2; F(c)=Xs3+c=e3(Xs3)-e2(Xs2) and (5) yields                                               
                            Xs3+c=F(c)                                                            (6)                   
                            This expresses the relation between the correction c and the sensor                         
                     measurement Xs3. Now as mentioned above, for proper registration we would like                     
                     Xs3=0. It can be shown that the value of c that achieves this result may be                        
                     determined using the iteration                                                                     
                            ci+1=ci+Xs3i                                                          (7)                   
                     where the subscript i indicates that the parameter is associated with the i-th                     
                     sheet of paper. The convergence conditions for this iteration are well known; in                   
                     the current application convergence will not be an issue.                                          
                            In the absence of noise the iteration (7) will yield the desired correction. In             
                     the presence of noise however, it should be modified to                                            
                     Ci+1=ci+b*Xs3i0<b<1                                                          (8)                   
                            It can be shown that the factor b has the effect of providing averaging                     
                     which regulates the stability of the iteration. Smaller values of b increases both                 
                     stability and the time required to calibrate the sensor.                                           
                            The method for calibrating the sensor requires feeding sheets of paper to                   
                     different lateral positions of sensors 132 and 134. The gamut of which must                        
                     encompass the sensor range. This is difficult to do when feeding out of a paper                    
                     feeder. A better method moves a single sheet of paper back and forth in the nips                   
                     many times. On the return move, the nips position the sheet to different lateral                   
                     positions and orientations at datum 2. This provides the initial conditions for the                
                     forward calibration move. The return move can be either deterministic or random.                   
                     In the results below a random return move was chosen.                                              
                            The above procedure can also be ganged to adjust the position of a sheet                    
                     at a third location. The position of the sheet at a third location can be measured                 
                     and the desired position at the second position can be adjusted accordingly so                     
                     that the sheet is properly registered at the third location.                                       








Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007