Ex Parte WATANABE et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-2274                                                        
          Application No. 08/387,158                                                  

          protection anode which includes the alloy.  Claims 33, 39, 45               
          and 66 are illustrative:                                                    
          33. A reinforced concrete structure comprising a cementitious               
               material, metal reinforcement, and a cathodic protection               
               anode, said anode comprising an alloy of about 20% to about            
               50% Zn, 0.11% to about 0.6% In and the balance Al.                     
          39. A reinforced concrete structure comprising a cementitious               
               material, metal reinforcement, and a cathodic protection               
               anode, said anode consisting essentially of an alloy of                
               about 10% to about 50% Zn, 0.11% to about 0.6% In and the              
               balance Al.                                                            
          45. An alloy for a sacrificial anode comprising about 20% to                
               about 50% of Zn, 0.11% to about 0.6% In, about 0.0005% to              
               about 0.3% of at least one metal selected from Zr, Si, Ce,             
               Ti, and B, and the balance Al.                                         
          66. An alloy for a sacrificial anode consisting essentially of              
               about 10% to about 50% of Zn, 0.11% to about 0.6% In, about            
               0.02% to about 0.2% of Ce and the balance Al.                          
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Sakano et al. (Sakano)              3,172,760      Mar.  9, 1965            
          Apostolos                           4,506,485      Mar. 26, 1985            
          Linder et al. (Linder)              4,740,355      Apr. 26, 1988            
          Kuramoto et al. (JP ‘637)            2-149637      Jun.  8, 1990            
               (Japanese kokai)                                                       
          Hanazaki et al. (JP ‘683)             4-66683      Mar.  3, 1992            
               (Japanese kokai)                                                       
          Kuramoto (JP ‘128)                   4-157128      May  29, 1992            
               (Japanese kokai)                                                       
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:            
          claims 33, 34, 39-41, 43, 44, 46-48, 52, 55, 58 and 61 over                 
          Linder or Sakano, in view of Apostolos and the appellants’                  
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007