Interference No. 104,101
Page 29
Mr. Paicely’s testimony and notebook do not provide the results of the mass spectroscopy
test conducted for Mr. Cullinan. Furthermore, neither the notebook nor Mr. Paicely’s testimony
indicate that Mr. Cullinan had correctly identified the structure of the compound sent for testing.
3. Susan M. Sharples’ Testimony Does Not Confirm the Identity of the
Compounds Allegedly Made by Mr. Cullinan
Ms. Susan M. Sharples is a Physical Chemist employed by Lilly. (EX 1160, ¶ 2). Ms.
Sharples testified that the physical chemistry submission sheet requests 469307, 469590 and
469823 are true and accurate copies of those contained in Physical Chemistry microfilm archives.
(EX 1160, ¶ 6).
Ms. Sharples’ testimony helps verify that Lilly’s P-Chem requests presented into
evidence are true and accurate copies of those contained in Lilly’s P-Chem Laboratory microfilm
archives. Her testimony does not comment upon the accuracy of the information contained
within those requests. In particular, Ms. Sharples’ testimony fails to confirm that Mr. Cullinan
manufactured a compound having the structure depicted as Lilly compound 311583.
4. Mr. F. William Bell’s Testimony Does Not Confirm the Identity of the
Compounds Allegedly Made by Mr. Cullinan
Mr. F. William Bell is an Assistant Senior Chemist at Lilly. (EX 1159, ¶ 2). Mr. Bell
testified that the 311583 submission sheet (LX 1216, Bates No. 3114) presented into evidence is
a true and accurate copy of the one he obtained from Lilly’s Research Records. (EX 1159, ¶ 7).
Page: Previous 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007