Interference No. 104,583 Paper 138
Chambon v. Evans Page 2
Junior party Chambon has filed notice that it “does not intend to continue in the
captioned interference” (Paper 137, p. 2). We accordingly enter judgment against
Chambon as having filed a written “abandonment of the contest” pursuant to 37 CFR
§ 1.662(a). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 2 (Paper
131, p. 2) is awarded against the junior party, PIERRE CHAMBON, ANDREE KRUST,
NIGEL BRAND and MARTIN PETROVICH;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party PIERRE CHAMBON, ANDREE KRUST,
NIGEL BRAND and MARTIN PETROVICH, is not entitled to a patent containing claims
1, 2, 11-16, 18, 37-45 and 56 (corresponding to Count 2) of Application 08/416,595;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made of record in
Application 08/416,595 and the files of Patents 5,171,671 and 5,571,692;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party RONALD M. EVANS, ESTELITA S.
ONG, PRUDIMAR S. SEGUI, CATHERINE C. THOMPSON, KAZUHIKO UMESONO
and VINCENT GIGUERE, is not entitled to claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 9 and 11-14 of U.S. Patent
No. 5,171,671 (Paper 129);
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement which has not
been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661; and
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007