Ex Parte GREEN - Page 8




             (Als explained by Dr. Salisbury, the specification of                 
             Green's '665 patent (and thus the '930 application) often             
             uses the term "end effector" to refer to the operative end            
             of the surgical instrument used to manipulate tissues.                
             (Green EXHIBIT 1014, page 4, paragraph 8; additional fact             
             paragraph 3, supra.) As can be understood with reference to           
             Fig. 9 of Green's '665 patent, robotic arms generally define          
             a kinematic chain of joints and links between a base 110 of           
             the robot and a working end of a robotic tool 114R. In                
             robotics, the working end of the tool is often referred to            
             as the "end effector" (as in Green's '665 patent).                    
             Alternatively, it is also known in robotics to define some            
             other convenient location (often a joint) along the                   
             kinematic chain as the "end effector." (Green EXHIBIT 1014,           
             page 4, paragraph 8; additional fact paragraph 3, supra.)             
             This is merely a difference in nomenclature. Any convenient           
             interface or joint along the kinematic chain may be                   
             designated the "end effector," so that the '665 patent, and           
             thus the '930 application. effectively discloses an                   
             articulate arm having an end effector for holding surgical            
             instrument, (Green EXHIBIT 1014, page 4,paragraph 8;                  
             additional fact paragraph 3, supra.) (Emphasis added)                 
             (Paper 50 at 8).                                                      

             The above-noted argument is responsive to Wang's argument             
        regarding written description support for the end effector. We             
        specifically addressed Green's argument presented above in our             
        decision as follows:                                                       
                  Dr. Salisbury's testimony is of little value because             
             the meaning defined by Green in 1930 is contrary to the               
             alleged "common meaning." The term "end effector" is used             
             in'930 to describe a surgical instrument and not the end of           
             an instrument or tool, or an intermediate joint or link               
             along a kinematic-chain of joints and links.                          
                  Green has not used the term "end effector" according to          
             its common meaning as pointed out by Dr. Salisbury. Nothing           
             stemming from Green's specification indicates that Green was          
             aware of the asserted broad meaning of "end effector" urged           
             by Dr. Salisbury. Green used the term in a very narrow                
             sense that is even outside of the broad scope of the meaning          
             urged by Dr. Salisbury. The surgical instrument necessarily           
             embodies its own end and thus cannot be a joint or link               
             located between the robot base and an end of itself.                  

                                      - 8 -                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007