FORT et al. V. DUNLAP et al. - Page 2



          Interference No. 104,652                                                   
          Dunlap v. Fort                                                             
          ADVERSE JUDGMENT UNDER CFR § 1.662.”  It has a certificate of              
          service which indicates that it was mailed to the senior party on          
          October 24, 2001.  The board, however, has not yet received the            
          original of such paper.  Nonetheless, we will act on the copy as           
          though it were the original.  If the original is received later,           
          it will be accorded a new paper number and placed in the file.             
               Junior party Dunlap states:                                           
                         Enclosed herewith is a Notice of                            
                    Cancellation and Abandonment filed by the                        
                    Junior Party herein in the application of                        
                    this interference.                                               
                         Junior party requests and agrees to an                      
                    adverse judgment under CFR § 1.662 and hereby                    
                    disclaims the invention defined by the counts                    
                    of this interference.                                            
               Also pending before the board is senior party Fort’s                  
          preliminary motion 1 (Paper No. 22) for judgment against Dunlap’s          
          claims 54, 55, and 56 as being unpatentable over prior art.                
               It is                                                                 
               ORDERED that in light of junior party Dunlap’s request for            
          entry of adverse judgment, senior party’s preliminary motion 1 is          
          dismissed as moot;                                                         
               FURTHER ORDERED that junior party’s request for entry of              
          adverse judgment is granted;                                               


                                        - 2 -                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007