FOSTER et al. V. BANG et al. - Page 11





                                                                              Interference No. 104,733                   
                                                                                           Page No. 11                   


                          b. Coding Sequence Unpredictability                                                            
            F16. Even if one predicted the existence of at least one DNA polymorphism in a gene,                         
            one could not predict where in the coding sequence the difference(s) would occur, how                        
            many differences would occur, or what the differences would be. As such, provided                            
            with the coding sequence of a single gene, one of ordinary skill in the art could not                        
            predict with accuracy the number or location of DNA differences between the genes of                         
            different people encoding the same protein. (Paper No. 17, p. 5, T1 0; Paper No. 27, p.                      
            3, admitting UW facts 6-16.)                                                                                 


            F17. The two codon differences between UW's claim 3 sequence and Lilly's claim 1                             
            sequence could not have been predicted in advance based on knowledge of either                               
            Lilly's nucleotide sequence or Lilly's amino acid sequences. (Paper No. 17, p. 5, T1 1;                      
            Paper No. 27, p. 3, admitting UW facts 6-16.)                                                                


            F18. One of ordinary skill in the art could not have predicted the particular DNA                            
            sequence of UW claim 3 based on the amino acid sequence of human protein C light                             
            chain, such as that recited in Lilly claim 81, or a particular DNA encoding that amino                       
            acid sequence, such as that provided in Lilly claim 82. (Paper No. 17, p. 11, T21; Paper                     
            No. 27, p. 3, admitting UW facts 18-21).                                                                     











Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007