The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 23
Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel
Box Interference Filed: February 28, 2002
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
CLARENCE N. AHLEM and STEVEN M. TORKELSON
Junior Party,
(Application 08/844,946),
v.
RICHARD P. HAUGLAND and WOJCIECH SZALECKI
Senior Party
(Patent 5,798,276).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,744
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, MEDLEY and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGEMENT
(Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662)
Senior Party Haugland et al. has conceded priority to the count and requested adverse
judgement. (Paper No. 22). Upon consideration of the record, it is:
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 and Count 2 (Notice Declaring
Interference, Paper No. 1, pages 5-7), is awarded against Senior Party Haugland et al.
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007