The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 25
Filed by: TriiżLlSection Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed
Washington, D.C. 20231 22 May 2002
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
JOHN E. STARRETT, JR., KENNETH M. TRAMPOSCH, XINA NAIR,
PETER R. RECZEK, ANNA ERICSSON, ANNE MARINIER,
ALAIN MARTEL and FRED C. ZUSI,
Junior Party, MAU D
(Patent 5,945,561),
V. MAY 2 2 2002
VIDYASAGAR VULIGONDA, ALAN T. JOHNSON
and ROSHANTRA A. CHANDRARATNA, PAT PATIV). OFFICE
130AIII) OF PATENT APPEALS
Senior Party AND INTMMENCES
(Application 09/482,700).
Patent Interference 104,803
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, TORCZON, and
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR S 1.662
A. Conference call
A telephone conference call was held on May 20, 2002, at
approximately 1:30 p.m., involving:
(1) Gabor I. Szekeres, Esq., counsel for Vuligonda;
(2) Irving N. Feit, Esq., counsel for Starrett;
(3) Mark Nagumo, Administrative Patent Judge;
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007