THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CALVIN F. KONZAK and ENRIQUE A. POLLE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0212
Application No. 08/261,7591
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed June 17, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/981,748, filed November 24, 1992, now
abandoned; which is a continuation in part of Application No.
07/858,401, filed March 26, 1992, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/761,250, filed September
18, 1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation of
Application No. 07/270,737, filed November 14, 1988, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007