The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOVE SKELBAEK and STEEN ANDERSEN
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2536
Application No. 08/710,690
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting
1
claims 1 to 6, 16 to 18, 25 and 26. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1The subject matter of claims 22 to 24 has been indicated as allowable by the Examiner.
The subject matter of claims 7 and 19 to 21 has been indicated as containing allowable subject matter.
However, these claims depend upon a rejected claim and stand objected to. (Paper no. 22, p. 3.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007