Ex Parte AGRAWAL et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                                 Paper No. 19        
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                    
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                    
                               Ex parte OM P. AGRAWAL,                               
                              BRADLEY A. SHARPE GEISLER,                             
                                and NICHOLAS A. SCHMITZ                              
                                     ____________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 1999-0133                                
                              Application No. 08/459,570                             
                                     ____________                                    
                                       ON BRIEF                                      
                                     ____________                                    
          Before JERRY SMITH, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.         
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the           
          examiner's final rejection of claims 1-281, which are all of the           
          claims pending in this application.                                        





               1 An amendment (Paper No. 9, filed February 13, 1997) submitted       
          subsequent to the final rejection (Paper No. 6, mailed September 6, 1996) has
          been entered by the examiner (Paper No. 11, mailed March 3, 1997).         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007