Ex parte MARGUCCI - Page 4


                  Appeal No. 1999-0660                                                                                           
                  Application No. 08/312,406                                                                                     

                                                   New Ground of Rejection                                                       
                          Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), the following new ground of rejection                       
                  is entered against claims 1 through 10:                                                                        
                          Claims 1 through 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                           
                  being indefinite and hence failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject                  
                  matter which appellant regards as his invention. Our difficulty with the claim language                        
                  centers on the following recitation in claim 1:                                                                
                                  said forming member including an outer surface portion which is                                
                          unbonded to said sheath and unsupported thereby and spaced from intimate                               
                          contact therewith  with the internal passageway of said sheath and said outer                          
                          surface portion of said forming member being in opposed facing and spaced                              
                          relationship with said outer tubular sheath . . .                                                      
                          The foregoing claim limitation is rendered incomprehensible by the phrase “with                        
                  the internal passageway of said sheath.”  Perhaps this phrase should have been deleted                         
                  when claim 1 was amended in the amendatory paper filed April 8, 1996, but it would be                          
                  speculation on our part to conclude that appellant intended to omit this phase. In the final                   
                  analysis, appellant must recite what he regards as his invention.  See 35 U.S.C. § 112,                        
                  second paragraph.                                                                                              
                          In summary, the examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is reversed,                         
                  and a new ground of rejection has been entered against the appealed claims pursuant to                         
                  37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                                                                             
                          This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)                         
                  (amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct.                       
                  10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR                            




                                                                4                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007