Ex parte LARSON et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                                 Paper No. 26         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                        Ex parte GARY B. LARSON, DONNA KOLOGE,                        
                         CYNTHIA RETALLICK, and AUSTIN WELLS                          
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-0727                                 
                              Application No. 08/814,901                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before PAK, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  


               Larson et al. (appellants) appeal from the examiner's final            
          rejection of claims 1 through 10 which are all of the claims                
          pending in the present application.                                         
               The subject matter on appeal is directed to a process for              
          producing printed circuit boards.  Claim 1, which is                        







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007