Appeal No. 1999-1542
Application No. 08/806,864
Le Van et al. (Le Van) 4,555,739 Nov. 26,
1985
Chhabra et al. (Chhabra) 4,894,740 Jan.
16,
1990
Yoneoka et al. (Yoneoka)1 JP 61-148684 July 7, 1986
Claims 12, 13, 15-18, 21, 22, 25, 35, 36, 44, 45, and 47
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Yoneoka in view of Le Van and Chhabra.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants and the
Examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for
their respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have considered the rejections advanced by the Examiner
and the supporting arguments. We have, likewise, reviewed the
Appellants’ arguments set forth in the brief.
We reverse.
In our analysis, we are guided by the general proposition
that in an appeal involving a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103,
1English translation is enclosed with this decision.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007