Ex parte BURMEISTER et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                                 Paper No. 30         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
              Ex parte PAUL H. BURMEISTER, RICHARD E. CAPPETTA, STEVEN S.             
                               HACKETT and PAUL SLAIKEU                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-1959                                 
                              Application No. 08/881,586                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before COHEN, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                  
          BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 28-39, which are all of the claims pending              
          in this application.                                                        


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants’ invention relates to intravascular guide               
          wires.  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007