Ex parte REMISZEWSKI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-2065                                                        
          Application 08/651,502                                                      



                    This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s                  
          final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 7-9, 19, 45 and 46 and from              
          the                                                                         


          examiner’s refusal to allow claims 3, 14, 15 and 20 as amended              
          in the after final amendment, Paper No. 53, filed December 18,              
          1998.  Claims 13, 21-23, 26, 28-31, 34-39 and 44 stand                      
          allowed, and                                                                
          claims 10 and 11 are objected to as being dependent on a                    
          rejected base claim and according to the examiner would be                  
          allowable if rewritten in independent form.  Claims 5, 6, 12,               
          16-18, 24, 25, 27, 32, 33 and 40-43 have been canceled.                     


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
                    Appellants’ invention relates to a surgical stapling              
          apparatus including a first handle member (30) with a jaw                   
          member (33) having a staple-retaining member (90) and a second              
          handle member (10) with a jaw member (14) having an anvil                   
          (16).  The handle members are pivotally connected to each                   
          other (at 50).  The apparatus further includes a staple pusher              

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007