Ex Parte ELLENBY et al - Page 2



         Appeal No. 1999-2075                                                    
         Application No. 08/482,944                                              

         A model displayed as a two-dimensional figure on a display has an       
         associated perspective related to the perspective of a three-           
         dimensional scene. On movement of the imaging system such that the      
         perspective of the scene changes, the perspective of the model          
         changes in correspondence in accordance with position, attitude,        
         and range measurements with respect to the scene being addressed.       
              Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as follows:     
              1.)  An apparatus for creating a computer model at a display       
         comprised of imagery from a real-scene and imagery from the model,      
         the apparatus being comprised of:                                       
              a.)  an electronic camera in electrical communication with a;      
              b.)  computer operable for running CAD software, acquiring         
         images from said electronic camera, receiving physical measurement      
         information, computing perspective adjustments, combining imagery       
         from said electronic camera with imagery from said CAD software,        
         displaying combined imagery at a display; and                           
              c.)  position, attitude and range measurement apparatus in         
         electrical communication with said computer.                            
              The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                    
         Pryor                        4,851,905          Jul. 25, 1989           
         Saunders et al. (Saunders)   5,252,950          Oct. 12, 1993           
         Fellous                      5,479,597          Dec. 26, 1995           
                                               (filed Apr. 27, 1992)             
              Claim 1 stands finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as        
         being anticipated by Fellous.  Claims 1-4 stand finally rejected        
         under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner        

                                        2                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007