The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CARL J. BILGRIEN, SHAWN K. MEALEY,
and MICHAEL W. SKINNER
___________
Appeal No. 1999-2201
Application No. 08/704,063
__________
ON BRIEF
_________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 17-22, 24-27, 30-32 and 35-37. Claims 2-8,
11-13 and 33-34, the only other claims pending in this
application, stand allowed by the examiner (see the Final
Rejection dated Aug. 25, 1998, Paper No. 10, page 2, and the
Brief, page 2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
§ 134.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a
method of making a curable silicone release coating composition
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007