Ex Parte MATSUDA et al - Page 2



                Appeal No. 1999-2383                                                                                                          
                Application No. 08/573,487                                                                                                    

                         According to appellants, the invention is directed to an                                                             
                electrophotographic transfer paper comprising a base paper and a                                                              
                coating layer, where the coating layer is provided on at least one                                                            
                side of the base paper and includes a pigment and a binder (Brief,                                                            
                page 2).  The pigment used in the coating layer comprises calcium                                                             
                carbonate with an average particle size of 1.5 to 8.0 microns, and                                                            
                the transfer paper has an air permeability (AP) of 10 to 90                                                                   
                seconds, a coefficient of paper-to-paper friction of 0.5 to 0.9                                                               
                at 28EC. and 85% relative humidity, and a smoothness of 60 to 300                                                             
                seconds (id.).  A copy of illustrative independent claim 1 is                                                                 
                attached as an Appendix to this decision.                                                                                     
                         The examiner has relied upon Hosomura et al. (Hosomura), U.S.                                                        
                Patent No. 4,778,711, issued Oct. 18, 1988, as evidence of                                                                    
                obviousness.  Accordingly, the claims on appeal stand rejected                                                                
                under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Hosomura (Answer,                                                               
                page 3).   We reverse the examiner’s rejection for reasons stated2                                                                                                               

                         2The rejection, as restated on page 3 of the Answer,                                                                 
                actually recites “Hosomura et al-4,778,487.”  However, the                                                                    










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007