Ex Parte TREVINO - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 12              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                Ex parte ROY TREVINO                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-2690                                  
                               Application 08/720,563                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before RUGGIERO, LALL, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of           
          claims 1-9, which are all of the claims pending in the present              
          application.  An amendment filed September 21, 1998 after final             
          rejection, which amended claim 4, was approved for entry by the             
          Examiner.                                                                   


                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007