PERKINS v. EDWARDS et al - Page 2




               On May 10, 2002, board personnel Sonja Despertt spoke with             
          Mr. Roberts, counsel for Edwards (Vidamed, Inc.) to inquire                 
          whether Vidamed, Inc. would respond to the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.             
          Mr. Roberts indicated that Vidamed, Inc. would not respond to the           
          ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.                                                        
               Upon consideration of the record, it is                                
               ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1 at            
          5), the sole count in the interference, is awarded against junior           
          party Rodney C. Perkins.                                                    
               FURTHER ORDERED that junior party Rodney C. Perkins is not             
          entitled to a patent containing claims 1-18 (corresponding to               
          Count 1) of U.S. Patent 5,454,782.                                          
               FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of             
          record in files of application 08/723,588 and U.S. Patent                   
          5,454,782.                                                                  
















                                        - 2 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007