DAMME et al v. MIYAKE - Page 2

                    FURTHER ORDERED that senior party, HIDEO MIYAKE and              
          IKUO KAWAUCHI, is not entitled to a patent containing claim 21             
          of application 09/993,634, which corresponds to Count 1; and               
                    FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be given            
          a paper number and be entered in the administrative records of             
          Van Damme’s 6,153,353 patent and Miyake’s 09/993,634                       
          application.                                                               





                         ____________________________                                
                         JAMESON LEE                   )                             
                         Administrative Patent Judge )                               
                                                       )                             
                                                       )                             
                    _____________________________ ) BOARD OF                         
                                                            PATENT                   
                         SALLY GARDNER LANE            )   APPEALS AND               
                         Administrative Patent Judge )  INTERFERENCES                
                                                       )                             
                                                       )                             
                         _____________________________ )                             
                         MICHAEL P. TIERNEY            )                             
                         Administrative Patent Judge )                               













                                          2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007