Ex Parte NAGATA et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                            Paper No. 16              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                     Ex parte AKIHIRO NAGATA, TOSHIAKI ARAGANE,                       
                        TAKASHI HAMADA, and YOSHIKI MATSUURA                          
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2001-0368                                  
                             Application No. 09/008,675                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before CAROFF, WARREN, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                              ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                
               Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.197(b), appellants request rehearing            
          of the panel decision dated Aug. 22, 2002, wherein the panel                
          affirmed the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-10, 13-17 and           
          21-26.  All the other pending claims in appellants’ application,            
          claims 11-12 and 18-20, stand allowed by the examiner.                      
               Appellants’ request for rehearing is solely directed to the            
          rejection of claims 1, 3-6, 10, 13-14, 16-17, 21 and 24-25 under            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007