Ex Parte OGAWA et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1112                                                        
          Application No. 08/518,363                                                  


               1.   A method of pattern formation comprising:                         
               irradiating light from an effective light source to a phase            
          shifting mask, wherein said effective light source has a center             
          portion, said center portion being 10 to 40 % of an outer                   
          diameter of said effective light source, and                                
               with said irradiated light, transferring a pattern of the              
          mask onto a substrate,                                                      
               wherein an amount of light emitted from said center portion            
          of said effective light source is less than a peak amount of                
          light emitted from peripheral portions of the effective light               
          source by 2 to 90 percent.                                                  
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Suzuki et al. (Suzuki)        5,305,054           Apr. 19, 1994             
          Shiozawa et al. (Shiozawa I) 5,345,292            Sep. 06, 1994             
          Muraki                        5,363,170           Nov. 08, 1994             
          Shiozawa (Shiozawa II)        5,459,547           Oct. 17, 1995             
                                                  (filed Jun. 25, 1993)               
          Burggraaf, Pieter, "Lithography's leading edge, Part 1: Phase               
          Shift Technology," Semiconductor International (Feb. 1992),                 
          pp. 42-47.                                                                  
               Claims 1, 59, and 62 through 64 stand rejected under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Muraki, Shiozawa I, or           
          Shiozawa II in view of Burggraaf.                                           
               Claims 1, 59, 62 through 64, and 68 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Suzuki in view of                
          Burggraaf.                                                                  
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 32,              
          mailed December 20, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning             
          in support of the rejections, and to appellant's Brief (Paper               

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007