Ex Parte SHEEM - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being                           
               entered today was not written for publication                          
               and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                   _______________                                    
                                                            Paper No. 15              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     

                               Ex parte SANG K. SHEEM                                 
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2001-0659                                  
                               Application 08/935,3681                                
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     
          Before BARRETT, FLEMING, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          final rejection of claims 1-3.  The rejections of claims 4, 5,              
          and 7-9 are withdrawn in the examiner's answer.  Thus, claims 4,            
          5, and 7-9 are objected to as depending from a rejected claim,              















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007